模仿让波德里亚尔，评价AIGC技术对于创作者与设计的影响。
在这个超越虚拟与现实界限的时代，AIGC已然成为了一个象征性的存在，犹如一个织网于社会结构上的数码蛛丝。创作者作为现代文化的灵魂，竟被这个虚拟之网禁锢，其创造力被渐渐消解，被异化成了符号的奴隶。AIGC所倡导的数字化互联世界，仿佛是现实的翻版，却又是一张扭曲的镜子，反射出虚假的欲望与真实的空虚。
在这个被AIGC主宰的景观中，创作者被迫纳入数字化的框架，其作品不再是真实的表达，而是被压缩成可点击、可分享的符号。这些符号在虚拟社交平台上不断轮回，失去了原本创作者的情感和深度。社会在AIGC的引领下变得越来越像一个信息沼泽，真实的交往被替代成了碎片化的点赞与评论。
然而，AIGC的影响并非一无是处。它为创作者提供了一个广阔的曝光平台，让更多人接触到他们的作品。然而这种曝光的背后，是创作者自身价值的模糊。他们不再以创造力和深度来衡量，而是以点击率和关注数为准绳。AIGC已然创造了一个信息的幻象，让人们沉溺其中，遗忘了真实世界的复杂性与多样性。
总之，AIGC在创作者与社会之间搭建起了一座数字化的桥梁，然而这座桥梁却同时也成为了一面分割现实与虚拟的高墙。它催生了表面的繁荣，却掩盖了创作者内心的困惑与焦虑。AIGC的光芒是虚幻的，创作者需要警醒于其中，不被虚拟世界的风暴吞噬，而是坚守内心的创作本真，追求超越符号的真实存在。
In emulation of Baudrillard, assess the impact of AIGC technology on creators and design.
In this era transcending the boundaries of the virtual and the real, AIGC has become a symbolic presence, akin to a digital web intricately woven into the fabric of society. Creators, as the soul of modern culture, find themselves ensnared by this web of the virtual, their creativity gradually dissolving, alienated into slaves of symbols. The digital interconnected world advocated by AIGC seems like a replica of reality, yet it is a distorted mirror reflecting false desires and genuine emptiness.
In this landscape dominated by AIGC, creators are compelled to fit into the digital framework, where their works are no longer genuine expressions but compressed into clickable, shareable symbols. These symbols cyclically circulate on virtual social platforms, losing the original emotions and depth of the creators. Society, guided by AIGC, increasingly resembles an information quagmire, replacing genuine interactions with fragmented likes and comments.
However, the impact of AIGC is not entirely devoid of merit. It provides creators with a broad exposure platform, allowing more people to encounter their works. Behind this exposure, though, lies the blurring of the intrinsic value of creators themselves. They are no longer measured by their creativity and depth but by click rates and followers. AIGC has created an illusion of information, ensnaring people within it and causing them to forget the complexity and diversity of the real world.
In conclusion, AIGC has erected a digital bridge between creators and society, yet simultaneously, this bridge has become a high wall separating reality from the virtual. It has given rise to superficial prosperity while concealing the creators’ inner confusion and anxiety. The radiance of AIGC is illusory, and creators must remain vigilant within it, not allowing themselves to be devoured by the storms of the virtual world, but rather, holding steadfast to the authentic essence of their creativity and pursuing a reality beyond symbols.